Family Economies by Herrick Kimball, you really should. I touched on a similar subject a few years ago here. DRAT! I linked the wrong post. THIS ONE is more to the point.
My family has been on the same farm for a long time, and I have direct connection to a pile of multi-generational farmers among friends and family. In 1916, our farm was part of an agrarian nation and provided a relatively prosperous full time living for two adult men and their families. A short 40 years later, it was a hardscrabble place that only stayed in the family because my father and uncle wanted to keep a place to run our hunting dogs. They paid the (then much lower) taxes by living poor, as they had been taught by their father.
I grew up here, with some knowledge of land capability and the demographics of the local food and farm markets. We have made a bit of money in some years, and in others nearly lost our thrift shop shirts. I cannot emphasize how difficult it is to wring a cash profit out of farming without some pretty deep pockets and patience. Livestock is harder than fruits or vegetables in this regard. We mostly keep livestock these days for nutritional self defense (I ate at a supposed decent restaurant last week and ended up sick for five days!).
If you are new at farming, you need to be spending most of your time competing with the grocery store, by growing produce and raising stock for your family. If you raise stock, you need to have a keen understanding of how to minimize feed costs. I have seen many small livestock farms by exurbanites that have too many animals for the pasture available. There is nothing wrong with buying a bit of feed if you are
1. using the manure for the garden.
2. maximizing pasture for the full season in your respective climate.
3. have a rough idea about your feed costs versus grocery store meat of comparable quality and are willing to live with that.
Sunday, January 26, 2014
Monday, January 6, 2014
A Shooting Party
![]() |
Shooting for the Beef, An 1850 painting by George Caleb Bingham shows Americans enjoying the national sport of agrarian America. |
In rural western Pennsylvania, interest in guns and shooting is deeply part of the culture. It is the reason that though we are a "purple state" politically, there is not a lot of political will for gun control in Harrisburg. Local interest in guns and shooting crosses all lines of ethnicity, education, age and culture. My party guests ranged in age from 15 to 63. Education among the adults ranged from advanced degrees to GED's. There were veterans of three wars, and the descendents of immigrants from at least 8 countries. The only unusual thing about the party guests was gender and occupation: a statistically high number of both full and part time farmers and all male.
When I made the invites, I said, "Bring whatever you want to shoot." Party-goers brought everything one might imagine: a .32 pocket pistol, the latest in AR15's, beat-up Deer rifles, a match grade M1A, an "Ohio deer gun" set up for 12 gauge slugs, 1911's, Ruger auto pistols, etc. When I made the first invitations, one guest asked if he could invite some others. I said "Sure, its a party. Only two rules, no booze and use your head about gun safety." Five guests thus came as strangers and departed as friends. There were no violations of the safety rules. The party was not a match. The only prizes were compliments for good shots and a bit of hazing for misses.
We shot handguns first at my 25 yard range, then went out to the 200 yard rifle range. Inevitably, everybody ended up having a chance to try each others' guns. This was a great help for the youngsters, who could learn useful information, such as the safety locations and manual of arms for various types of firearms. In between shooting, we talked dogs, Turkey hunting, farming,...... and guns.
Shooting is a great sport for many reasons, but one is the lack of a generation gap. The young shooters actually listened to the adults' advice and were delighted to be there. There are few other realms of activity where teenagers actually want to hang out with their parents and elders.
After the party, I found out some wives and daughters wanted to attend, but did not want to be the only female in attendance. It would not have been the case, had they known other women were interested. I believe I will be hosting another shooting party soon.
Thursday, December 26, 2013
How Pelznickel saved Pennsylvania Christmas from the Quaker Scrooge
![]() |
A Modern Day Pezlnickel ready to scare the kids at Landis Valley Museum |
Today is "Second Christmas" and it was once a legal holiday in Pennsylvania. Second Christmas remains a legal holiday in Germany and is celebrated in England as Boxing Day and Ireland as St Stephens Day. I think we lose something with one day of Christmas as I once blogged about here.
I know I need more than one day. Western Pennsylvania Winter is a monotony of dark grey days and long cold nights. When nature is like that, God seems to me like a remote, uncaring, unhearing, entity. Thinking about God as a baby coming into a cold dark world into a barn full of urine and feces is a good antidote for Winter's darkness: Truly Emmanuel.
That Pennsylvania has any Christmas is largely thanks to the Pennsylvania Germans (once known as "Dutch"). Pennsylvania was the most ethnically diverse of all the original states, with English, Scots-Irish, and Germanic people each composing about a third of the population in 1790. The Quakers who founded the colony were once death on the holiday and still seem to be somewhat uncomfortable with it, as were many of the Mennonite groups. The Scots-Irish who took their religion seriously were also anti-Christmas, bowing to the traditions of the Scottish Presbyterian Church. Pennsylvania Christmas was once the sole domain of a tiny Anglican minority and the Lutheran and German Reformed (who have always been far more numerous than the Plain sects). Even stalwart German Calvinists never seemed to have the issue with Christmas that the British Puritans did. The season began with Pelznickel scaring the kids, special Christmas markets, and actual Christmas was regarded as a 48 hour feast of sausage, music, conviviality, and real hard cider.
The idea of a Christmas Holiday created a political issue in the state legislature in the early Nineteenth Century. The Dutchmen wanted to close down state government for not just one day, but TWO! They won that fight, and by the time of the Civil War even New England states got somewhat on board with the holiday. Somewhere along the way though, we lost that 24 extra hours to party!
Froliche Zweite Weihnachten!
Tuesday, November 26, 2013
Lyme Disease Update
![]() |
Deaths' Head Tombstone from Old New England, stands in contrast to our death denying culture. |
My last post was actually on her blog, and about my Lyme disease. You can read my theory on Lyme here. I wrote it a couple weeks ago. I am pleased to be slowly getting better each day. The best part is I finished my course of medicine. I am unsure where side effects of the antibiotics began and where the disease ended.
The Lyme has been frustrating. I am officially a codger in years now, but have not fully come to grips with the prospect of significant physical decline. I am much better prepared for death than disability. For a long time, I have been in habit of preparing for death each morning. I consider it right after the first cup of coffee and before my second cigarette.
Historically, the old farmers often feared disability more than death. In 18th Century New England, the angel of death stared you in the face every time you walked by the cemetery. Part of the colonial strategy at Bunker Hill was to keep the Yankee militia's legs shielded by a stone wall, so that they might be killed; but not hit in the leg and disabled.
With the Lyme, I was not prepared for either the feeling that comes from being unable to do normal homestead tasks, or the feeling sorry for myself that results from inability.......
If I am smart, I might be able to use this experience as a preparation for growing older on the homestead. I do have some guides. Last year, I read William B. Irvine's book on Stoicism. If the reader is a Christian believer, there is almost nothing in Stoicism that is inconsistent with classical Christianity. If the reader is not a believer, the Stoics may provide some useful grounding in life besides football, face book, and dancing with the stars. Here is Dr. Irvine's lecture on growing old with grace. Its worth a listen.
Sunday, September 29, 2013
Book Review: Surviving Off Off Grid
When my wife had her old Granny
Miller site, (the infamous one that crashed) we received a free prepublication copy of Surviving
Off Off-Grid: Decolonizing the Industrial Mind for our review. I wrote the
following review back then, and recently dug it off the old computer to revive it here because the Author has been
donating royalties towards a new film. The film is called Beyond Off Grid.As we are now entering a new
post-literate age, a film may have greater impacts upon many more people than a
book. If you have not read this book, consider ordering it before the end of
the month and help support the Beyond Off Grid. (I realize this is late, but
better late than never). I am late because I fretted about changing the original review essay a bit. Were I to write this review today, I would probability
be more nuanced in my discussion of the relationship between agrarianism and
Christianity, but I decided to let the original review stand. I think its underscores the point that this is a very worthwhile book. The central thesis about decolonizing the industrial mind
is more pertinent today than when Mr. Bunker wrote the book.
I did not want to like this book.
The author, Michael Bunker, is a self described “Christian Agrarian
Separatist.” From my understanding of Mr, Bunker’s beliefs, he advocates that
Christian believers should separate from the World around them. I am a
Christian, and believe that agrarianism offers an excellent basis for a
nation’s political economy. I also believe that the Bible has a lot to say
about our relationship with nature and other people. However, I get uncomfortable mixing my faith in Christ crucified
with any other political, economic or social agenda. History seems to be on my
side in this regard. From Byzantine
“symphony” between church and state, to Cromwell’s Commonwealth, to the 19th
Century Anglo Catholic Socialists, Christian vegetarianism, the “Dutch
Christian Goat Breeders Society”, and liberation theology, the church has been
there and done that. I also live in the graveyard of failed Christian agrarian
separatist ventures (Zoarites, Harmonists, etc). Only the Amish/Mennonites have
survived, but that is the subject of another essay. My objections to Mr.
Bunker’s theology are not pertinent to why I think this book is important.
Furthermore, I do not debate religion on the Internet. If Mr. Bunker would ever
come to Pennsylvania, I invite him to discuss this topic at leisure on my porch
over some beer or milk.
As the reader may suspect at this
point, I like this book very much. This book is not an apologia for Mr.
Bunker’s theology (though it informs him and is found throughout the book).
This work is otherwise hard to categorize. It is part history, part cultural
criticism, with some biography. It is explicitly not another “how to” book, but
the intelligent reader will extract many practical ideas. The best way I can
characterize this book, is that it is about mindset. Mindset is what lets the
soldier, policeman or armed citizen win a fight. Mindset is the most important
difference between the dead and the survivors in any crisis. Mr. Bunker’s
thesis is that industrialism and urbanity have “colonized” the human mind in 21st
Century America, and he has set out to de-colonize it. This de-colonizing will
create a mindset that will allow families to thrive in what may become an
increasingly difficult future.
While dealing with the lofty
subject of human thought, this book is anything but academic. The style is very
readable and conversational. The prepper or survivalist will find some serious
tests to determine just how prepared he really is (starting with some
discussion about what the word “Survival” really means). A person who has never
thought deeply about how our nation devolved into the present mess will
hopefully read this as a needed alarm call. The homesteader or small farmer of
any level of experience will find keys to better his endeavors by thinking in
new ways.
While I am not an advocate of
agrarian separatism, I believe Mr. Bunker may be one of the few people who
could write this book. His separatism gives him a perspective of distance from
the “grid” (which is much more than mere electric power, including debt and
wage slavery, and the omnipresent corporate/government alliance).
This book is also refreshing in its
practicality. The Internet has spawned some self-proclaimed survival experts
who lack any significant real world experience but the ability for noisy
self-promotion. There is also a horde of romanticized back to the land
resources that make the agrarian life seem like a breeze. Michael Bunker fits
neither of these classes. When
discussing land, water, light, heat, building, tools, and food, the author
speaks from a remarkable personal experience.
He understands that the old paths he has chosen lead to inevitable
physical discomfort and a heap of hard work. Yet his realism does not deny the
pleasures of an agrarian life. As a stockman, I especially appreciate his
understanding of land and livestock that counsels how to make the two fit
together wherever the reader might live, not just the author’s central Texas
home.
He also directly confronts common
objections anyone who sets out on a path of greater self-support will
encounter. One is the charge that any uses of technology by an off grid
agrarian represent hypocrisy. He demolishes the myth that a robust agrarian
society means everyone must be a farmer. He also supports a host of
“intermediate means” as an integral part of one’s journey, so the reader need
not feel compelled to go naked into the wilderness and build a homestead
overnight. Yet use of these intermediate means must be accompanied by thought.
This part of the book is important for any homesteader who needs to explain to
his consumerist friends why he has chosen this life. It also offers
encouragement at any stage in the journey to independence.
The reader should be forewarned
that the author is very opinionated. This is a consequence of his independency
from the said grid. A free man can speak his mind without worrying about what a
boss or customer might think. Sadly, America was once full of open speaking
farmers like this. Maybe if enough people read this book it will be again.
While this book is thought provoking and challenging, it is in no way
offensive.
This is not a perfect book. There
is some incorrect historical data. The author asserts on page 10 that the
Romans “skipped the step” of respect for farm life (that the ancient Greeks
had) making a statement that ignores the agrarianism of the early Roman
Republic. There are a few others, but they are quibbles that could be corrected
by a good editor. The bibliography is also very skimpy for such a wide-ranging
work, amounting to only thirteen books (among which are books by the Christian
gentlemen of the survivalist movement
James Wesley, Rawles, and Herrick Kimball whom I regard as an agrarian
philosopher king.
Mr. Bunker has made compelling case
about why this book is for everyone, and I agree.
This book deserved serious
engagement, and more attention that it will probably get. I am hoping that the
film may bring greater serious discussion of these serious ideas for our
times.
Link to Michael Bunker's Author Page
Link to Michael Bunker's Author Page
Wednesday, September 18, 2013
Eternal Vigilance
One of my favorite blogs is Home on the Range. How can I not love a blog that centers on three of my favorite things (guns, dogs, and mealtime! ) Brigid understands the realities of the world as a very beautiful place, and the paradox that it is also sometimes a dangerous place. Her latest is a must read. Click on the quote from her poetic essay to read the rest.
"There is much we can be cleansed of, by the Water and by His blood, but there some things formed in the soul, which can not be bound by man, or removed with reason, things for which we should always be ready. For there will always be those whose capabilities for harm we can not always fathom but we should always dread. For that I am armed with not just the Second Amendment, but the blued steel of eternal vigilance".
"There is much we can be cleansed of, by the Water and by His blood, but there some things formed in the soul, which can not be bound by man, or removed with reason, things for which we should always be ready. For there will always be those whose capabilities for harm we can not always fathom but we should always dread. For that I am armed with not just the Second Amendment, but the blued steel of eternal vigilance".
Monday, September 9, 2013
Raccoon Recipes, Distributism, Chelsea Green Books, and Hard Cider
On a Sunday afternoon, if I
chanced
to be at home, I heard the cronching of the snow made by the step of a
long-headed farmer, who from far through the woods sought my house, to
have a social "crack"; one of the few of his vocation who are "men on
their
farms";who donned a
frock
instead of a professor's gown, and is as ready to extract the moral out
of church or state as to haul a load of manure from his barn-yard. We
talked
of rude and simple times, when men sat about large fires in cold,
bracing
weather, with clear heads; and when other dessert failed, we tried our
teeth on many a nut which wise squirrels have long since abandoned, for
those which have the thickest shells are commonly empty.
Henry Thoreau, Walden
Q. What do Raccoon Recipes, Distributism, Chelsea Green Books, and Hard Cider have in common?
A. Christian Farm and Homestead Radio
I am sometimes privileged to be a guest on this weekly show by Scott Terry. Scott is fun to talk to because he is like Thoreau's long headed farmer. He has that unique combination of being well grounded in real world practical skills (he is a full time dairyman, and was once a full time backcountry trapper in Alaska) but still extremely well read and a careful thinker.
Our last conversation covered everything in the title of this post block, plus we touched on Merle Haggard, the whiskey rebellion, the 19th Century Dutch Anti-Revolutionary Party, Ruger Firearms, coyote and bobcat trapping, Henry VIII, and squirrel dogs!
And big city folk call us neanderthals, rednecks, rubes, and hillbillies? I always smile inside when urbanites look down on country people as lacking sophistication. Real sophistication is complexity of thought and a broad interest in the world around us.
Henry Thoreau, Walden
Q. What do Raccoon Recipes, Distributism, Chelsea Green Books, and Hard Cider have in common?
A. Christian Farm and Homestead Radio
I am sometimes privileged to be a guest on this weekly show by Scott Terry. Scott is fun to talk to because he is like Thoreau's long headed farmer. He has that unique combination of being well grounded in real world practical skills (he is a full time dairyman, and was once a full time backcountry trapper in Alaska) but still extremely well read and a careful thinker.
Our last conversation covered everything in the title of this post block, plus we touched on Merle Haggard, the whiskey rebellion, the 19th Century Dutch Anti-Revolutionary Party, Ruger Firearms, coyote and bobcat trapping, Henry VIII, and squirrel dogs!
And big city folk call us neanderthals, rednecks, rubes, and hillbillies? I always smile inside when urbanites look down on country people as lacking sophistication. Real sophistication is complexity of thought and a broad interest in the world around us.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)